<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d10113038\x26blogName\x3dThe+things+I+think+about,+when+I+wish...\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dTAN\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://whybehonest.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://whybehonest.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d287680177826444571', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Thursday, May 12, 2005

Caught in the Act II

Okay, I took the Captain'sadvice and told SB that the crackhead has coroborrated her story about the event I don't remember.

"The crackhead says she remembers me making out with ______ in that parking lot."

"Yeah, she's the one who told me about it."

"What? I thought you saw it."

"No, the crackhead was in the club telling everyone."

Crackhead, you got some splainin' to do. How come you're the only eye witness? I was supposedly there, and I didn't even see it.

23 Comments:

Blogger sparklestone said...

This is getting funnier and I don't think it's peaked yet.

4:07 PM, May 13, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am the only eye witness b/c everyone else was probably at the bar. Think about it..does it sound plausible that I would catch someone making out & then immediately go & tell EVERYONE??? I think everyone should vote on that one.

9:26 AM, May 16, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

You didn't really ask that did you? Plausible? Bloody friggin likely is more like it.

I vote yes.

2:29 PM, May 16, 2005  
Blogger sparklestone said...

This is tricky. See, I think the Crackhead is suprisingly secretive. She is such a crackhead that you would assume she is a complete blabbermouth, but I know she isn't.

But that certainly doesn't mean she saw what she says she saw.

I am not sure we are voting on the right thing

4:58 PM, May 16, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

Sparklestone, you wouldn't by chance be weighing SB's word/memory over the crackhead's word/memory, would you?

Cause, them's like, fightin words.

7:15 PM, May 16, 2005  
Blogger mary bishop said...

I think they're selling the Sylow tapes on the internet...

4:20 AM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger sparklestone said...

Sylow, not saying anything of the sort, tho I do so love a good fight.

But I am saying is that the vote should be on just that:

SB's word/memory vs. the crackhead's word/memory

ps. marybishop is right. they are selling sylow tapes on the internet. but, while disgusting and yet strangly alluring, they don't shed any light on this particular issue

6:13 AM, May 17, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't get why SB's & my memory are in competition if we are corroborating stories. It's true I am not always a blabbermouth, however don't you think I would blab something that would embarrass Sylow? I think we all know that's a yes!

7:23 AM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

Well, we just didn't expect you to admit it, crackhead.

SB saya she remembers thinking when she heard the news "What is he thinking?"

She may not have realized it, but I think SB was into me way back then. Still, don't anybody start saying that this little incident was some sort of set back responsible for the subsequent four years it took for her to come to her senses and realize she was hot for me. I'm sure this had nothing to do with it.

9:21 AM, May 17, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is sorta what I saw....

10:36 AM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger sparklestone said...

Sylow. Well duhhhhhhh. Who wasn't into you back then?

Crackhead, I am not sure the whole Brody/Berry thing is helping your case. Kinda supports the whole you're a crackhead thing. What else you got?

10:44 AM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

Yeah, from that angle how could you be certain it was me? I mean it's not like I've ever worn a gold strapless evening gown.

10:51 AM, May 17, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok well what about this one? Or this? Or.....

10:55 AM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

I think that first one is suppose to be this.

Brutal, just brutal.

11:24 AM, May 17, 2005  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually I meant to post this. It looks like a seedy bar.

11:50 AM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

Hey, I think I know that girl, and despite the ring on his finger, that is definitely not his wife!

11:56 AM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger mary bishop said...

Why don't we all kiss and make up as opposed to kiss and make up a story about the kiss?

No? Okay...

12:06 PM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

But Mary, it was my (alledged) kissing of somone, not my wife, that started all this.

What kind of trouble are you trying to get me into?

12:16 PM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger mary bishop said...

Sylow, if your wife found you kissing sparklestone she might forget the memory of that other disputed kiss...

Should I kiss off? (When's the last time you heard that expression?)

5:46 PM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

Wow, I can't remember the last time someone brought into question Sparky & Sylow's private level of acceptable intimacy.

Boy, it sure does bring back memories.

6:58 PM, May 17, 2005  
Blogger mary bishop said...

Probably a sleepover...it always starts with an innocent sleepover...

5:03 AM, May 18, 2005  
Blogger sparklestone said...

It has been a while. Ask SB. Would she mind if someone said they saw us together in that bathroom downstairs in Coates Hall?

8:03 AM, May 18, 2005  
Blogger Sylow_P said...

You mean recently, or just back in our experimental days?

8:07 AM, May 18, 2005  

Post a Comment

<< Home